<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AS3: What were they thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceandcode.moomug.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceandcode.moomug.com/?p=187</link>
	<description>the daily adventures of computer science</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Morley</title>
		<link>http://scienceandcode.moomug.com/?p=187#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Morley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceandcode.moomug.com/?p=187#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Felix,

Thanks for the link about the precious advice received from www.curtismorley.com.  It does make sense that code blocks should have there own scope and at the same time I can understand why Adobe created it this way.

I have changed/added some clarity and examples on the site concerning AS3 Error 3596 on my site.

Thanks,
Curtis J. Morley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link about the precious advice received from <a href="http://www.curtismorley.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.curtismorley.com</a>.  It does make sense that code blocks should have there own scope and at the same time I can understand why Adobe created it this way.</p>
<p>I have changed/added some clarity and examples on the site concerning AS3 Error 3596 on my site.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Curtis J.&nbsp;Morley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
